Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

This annual magazine is created with a clear perspective: to develop an electronic magazine for the field of the education professionals.

The objective of Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers is to disseminate good academic practices and research results of teaching professionals. JETT pretends to become an educational research database to help spreading young researchers works-masters and doctorates students above all- and to serve as an advertising vehicle for works ¨under writing or article handouts¨. Besides, another function for JETT will be the diffusion of new publications through reviews.

 

Section Policies

Editorial

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Abstracts and Papers

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Reviews

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Jett is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercia-NoDerivative license.

 

 

Standards of publication and editorial process

1- Papers submitted should not have been previously published nor submitted for current consideration elsewhere at the moment of submission to JETT. 

2- Papers can be presented in Spanish, English, Portuguese, and French.

3- Papers must be related to education in its wide sense, training, and professionalization. JETT publishes research papers but also includes theoretical reflections, international literature reviews and interviews with relevant authors and book reviews of interest for the scientific community.

4- All participants are expected to adhere the Research Code of Conduct. If required, authors must certify their papers ethic committee approval.

5-    JETT doesn’t take the responsibility of the contents, judgments, and the expressed opinions in the published papers. Neither it is responsible about possible authorship derivatives conflicts of the published papers in the magazine. These responsibilities have to be taken exclusively by the authors of the published papers.

The responsibility for the content provided in the articles published and the opinions expressed are exclusively of the author(s) concerned. JETT is not responsible for errors in the contents or any consequences arising from the use of the information contained in it. The opinions expressed in the research papers/articles in this journal do not necessarily represent the views of the of the Journal. 

6- Paper and articles must follow APA style.

7- The authors must read, accept and fulfill the established commitments in the license DIGIBUG (Spanish license, English license).

8- The papers and the DIGIBUG license (signed and filled) will be uploaded in the platform, exactly in the Step 4. “uploading supplementary files”.

9-  Papers Features:

  • Extension: approximately 6000 words.
  • Title: 2 languages (English and other).
  • Authors: authors complete name, e-mail, department/knowledge area, and position
  • Abstract: 200-250 words in two languages (English and other).
  • Key words: 3 to 6 descriptors in two languages (English and other).
  • Fonts: Arial, 12.
  • File format: .doc, .odt


Papers  structure and recommendations for authors


Estructura y recomendaciones de manuscritos para autores

 

Editorial process

1- Once the paper is received at the JETT OJS platform, the editorial board will make a first evaluation to check the paper meets the established standards and fits the magazine thematic. Moreover, the board will check that the license DIGIBUG has been fulfilled.

2- The papers overcoming the first evaluation will be submitted to an evaluation by double blind peer review. 

3- Between the paper reception and the final evaluation result, should not exceed 5 months.


Download standards of publicarion and editorial process

Descargar instrucciones para el envío de colaboraciones en español

 

Standars for evaluators

1- Articles will be evaluated using a double blind peer review by accredited specialists. Anonymity is assured.

 2- Before starting the blind peer review process, the editorial board will make a first evaluation to check the article meets the required standards by the journal.

 3- Articles overcoming the first review will be evaluated in two ways: the first one-internal (member of the editorial board), the other one-external. In case of discrepancy between the two processes, a third evaluation will be required.

 4- Evaluators will apply the evaluation criteria established by JETT with complete independence and freedom. If there could be a conflict of interest in assessing an article, the reviewer must notify JETT, declining to perform the requested evaluation.

 5- In order to review the articles, the evaluators will use the template available in Spanish, French, Portuguese and English.

 6- Evaluators will have five options for the article global assessment (in all cases the decision should be justified in the commentaries section): 

  • Acceptable.
  • Acceptable pending minor revision.
  • Acceptable pending deep revision.
  • Unacceptable but can be recommended to other journal.
  • Unacceptable.

 7- To avoid plagiarism conflicts, the evaluators should use the anti-plagiarism application (Grammarly), and also the (Google and Google Scholar seekers).

 8- Evaluators will send the evaluation report (filling in the template) to the JETT OJS platform no later than 20 days after the reception of the template.

 9- For further information please contact jett@ugr.es



Download standards for evaluators


Descargar instrucciones para evaluadores en español

 

Indexing

-       Academic Journals Database (Nat Soft, Switzerland) (Link)

-       ANEP (Category B) (Link)

-       BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine) (Link)

-       CARHUS Plus+ (Category C)

-       CIRC 2.0 (Category C) (Link)

-       Citefactor-Academic Scientific Journals (Directory Indexing of International Research Journals) (Link)

-       Dialnet (Difusión de Alertas en la Red) (Link)

-       DICE-CINDOC (Difusión y Calidad Editorial de las Revistas Españolas de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas) (Link)

-       Digibug (Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Granada) (Link)

-       DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) (Link)

-       e-Revist@s (Plataforma Open Access de Revistas Científicas Electrónicas Españolas y Latinoamericanas) (Link)

-       ERIH Plus(European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences) (Link)

-       ESCI - Thomson Reuters (Emerging Sources Citation Index) (Link)

-       Google Scholar (Link)

-       Hispana – Europeana (MECD) (Link)

-       h Index (Link)

-       IRESIE (Indice de Revistas de Educación Superior e Investigación Educativa), UNAM (Link)

-       ISOC (Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, CCHS-CSIC) (Link)

-       Latindex (Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas) (Link)

-       MIAR (Matriu d'Informació per a l'Avaluació de Revistes) (Link)

-       MRU (MykolasRomery University, Mokslokrypčiųkodai) (Link)

-       OpenAIRE (OpenAIRE Consortium, European Commission) (Link)

-       Recolecta (Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, FECYT) (Link)

-       RESH (Revistas Españolas de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, CSIC/CINDOC) (Link)

-       Ulrichsweb Global Serials Directory (Link)

 

-       CAPES (Plataforma Sucupira) (In process)

-       ProQuest Education Journals (In process)

-       RECYT (FECYT-MEC) (In process)

-       Scopus (In process)

-       SHERPA/RoMEO (In process)

 

Evaluators

Américo Nunes Pérez, Universidade do Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

Benilde García Cabrero, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF, México

Carlos de Sousa Reis, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Damian Ossorio Lozano, Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, España

Dana T. Redford, University of New York, Nueva York, Estados Unidos

Daniel González González, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España

Emmanuelle Leclercq, Université Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, Francia

Eudaldo Corchón Álvarez, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España

Francisco Alvarado García, Universidad Iberoamericana, Ciudad de México, México

Ivan Fortunato, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil

Ivonne Fabiana Ramírez Martínez, Universidad Mayor Real y Pontificia San Francisco Xavier de Chuquisaca, UMRPSFXCH, Sucre, Bolivia

Javier Loredo Enríquez, Universidad Ibero Ciudad de México, México DF, México

José Álvarez Rodríguez, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España

Juan Antonio López Núñez, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España

Luis Ortiz Jiménez, Universidad de Almería, Almería, España

Luis Roberto Rivera Mazuera, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana de Cali, Colombia

María Asunción Romero López, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España

Marisol Latorre Navarro, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile

Rosa Branca Tracana, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal

Salvio Luis Rodríguez Higueras, Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Educación, Granada, España

Susana del Carmen Carena Bruno, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Argentina

Vanesa Gámiz Sánchez, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España

 

Ethic

The Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers will ensure ethical conduct and good practices throughout the entire process of editorial management and content of the Journal

 

Descargar normas éticas en español 

The Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers follows the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors. You can read more information about the code in the following link:

http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf

http://publicationethics.org/