Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers


Online ISSN: 1989-9572

Volume11, Issue1

The Impact of Bybee and Synectics Models on Creativity, Creative Problem-solving, and Students’ Performance in Geometry

Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 2020, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 68-78
10.47750/jett.2020.11.01.007

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of Bybee and Synectics on creativity, creative problem-solving, and performance of ninth-grade students in geometry. The research method was quasi-experimental with pre-test, post-test, and control group. From the entire population of the ninth-grade female students of public high schools in Tehran, three intact classrooms were selected by the cluster sampling method, each consisting of 30 students. Then, two classes were randomly assigned to two experimental groups and one control group. In addition, research instruments included Abedi’s creativity test, Basadur’s problem-solving creative test, and a researcher-made geometry test. In order to collect data, at first, pre-tests of performance, creativity and creative solution were performed on the subjects. After performing the patterns in the groups, post-tests of performance, creativity and creative solution were performed on the subjects. Finally, descriptive (the mean and standard deviation) and inferential ANCOVA statistics were used to analyze the data by SPSS software. The findings indicated that using the patterns of Bybee and Synectics on students’ creativity, creative problem-solving, and performance in geometry were significantly more influential compared to traditional teaching methods. The use of educational patterns appropriate to the educational content will lead to the training of creative people. 
Keywords:
Main Subjects:

  1. Abadi, J. (1993). The novelty and methods of its measuring. Journal of Psychological Research, 3 (72), 46-54.
  2. Abed, S., Davoudi, A. H., & Hoseinzadeh, M. (2015). The effect of synectics pattern on increasing the level of problem-solving and critical thinking skills in the students of Alborz province. WALZA Journal, 31 (1), 110-118.
  3. Acisli, S., Yalem, S. A., & Turgut, Ü (2011). An evaluation of activities designed in accordance with the 5E model by would-be science teachers. Procardia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, 708-71.
  4. Ahmad Khan. A., & Mahmood, N. (2017). The role of the Synectics model in enhancing students’ understanding of geometrical concepts. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education. 2 (11), 253-264.
  5. Aiamy. M., & Haghani, F. (2012). The effect of synectics and brain storming on 3rd grade students’ development of creative thinking on science. Procardia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 610-613.
  6. Arifiyanti, S. F., & Wahyuningish, S. (2015). Using integrated analogy in physics education to building the concept of representation: The way to be great inventor. Proceeding of International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science, Indonesia: Yogyakarta State University, 17-19 May 2015.
  7. Basador, M. S., Graen, G. B., & Green, S. G. (1982). Training in creative problem solving: Effect on ideation and problem finding in an applied research organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30 (1), 41-70.
  8. Blissett, S. E., & McGrath, R. E. (1996). The relationship between creativity and interpersonal problem‐solving skills in adults. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30 (3), 173-182.
  9. Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
  10. Demircioglu, G, & Cagatay, G. (2014). The effect of laboratory activities based on 5E model of constructivist approach on 9th grade students’ understanding of solution chemistry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3120-3124.
  11. Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., & Borjas, S. (2015). Benefits of “concreteness fading” for children’s mathematics understanding. Learning and Instruction, 35, 104-120.
  12. Gallenstein, N. (2013). Concept mapping for learners of all ages. Journal for Educators, Teachers, and Trainers, 4 (1), 59-72.
  13. Gordon, W. J. J. (1961). The development of creativity. In Elvadine R. S. (2007). Reaching Students through Synectics: A creative solution. Retrieved from http://www.ellieseligmann.com/essays/synec tics_seligmann.pdf
  14. Heid, K. (2008). Creativity and imagination: Tools for teaching artistic inquiry. Art Education, 61 (4), 40-46.
  15. Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Kalhon, E. (2013). Teachingpatterns. Translated by: Behrangi, M.R., Tehran: Kamal Tarbiat.
  16. Karimi, S., Shahvarani, A., & Haghverdi, M. (2019). The role of problem-based mathematics teaching according to the Kirkpatrick’s model on problem-solving performance of mathematics teachers. Journal for Educators, Teachers, and Trainers, 10 (1), 12-26.
  17. Karsli, F., & Ayas, A. (2014). Developing a laboratory activity by using 5E learning model on student learning of factors affecting the reaction rate and improving scientific process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143 (2014), 663-668.
  18. McLaren, D. (2010). Does theory have any point? Mathematics in School for Secondary and College Teachers of Mathematics, 39 (5), 2-9.
  19. Runisah Hemen, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2016). The enhancement of students’ creative thinking skills in mathematic through the 5E learning cycle with metacognitive technique. International Journal of Education and Research, 4 (7), 347-360.
  20. Shabani, H. (2016). Educational Skills of teaching methods and techniques. Twentieth edition, Tehran: SAMT Publication.
  21. Suciati, A. Vincentrisia, I. (2015). Application of learning cycle model (5E) learning with chart variation toward students’ creativity. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4 (1), 56-66.
  22. Tezer, M., & Cumhur, M. (2017). Mathematics through the 5E instructional model and mathematical modelling: The geometrical objects. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 13 (8), 4789-4804.
  23. Walia, P. (2012). Effect of 5E instructional model on the mathematical creativity of students. Journal of Golden Research Thoughts, 1 (10), 1-4.
  24. Zare, H., Imaniifar, H. R, Mostafaei, A., & Brothers, M. (2014). Validation and functional structure of the creative problem-solving test. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities, 3 (4),127-146.

  • Article View: 5,954
  • PDF Download: 5,448
Journal Information

Publisher: Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers

Email:  editorjett@gmail.com