Students’ perception of letters as specific unknown and variable: The Case of Iran
Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers,
2020, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 79-92
10.47750/jett.2020.11.01.008
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess student’s understanding of variable concept. In respect to thechanges of math curriculum in Iran, especially way that variable was introduced in the new textbook,
it is necessary to assess students’ understanding of variable involving these new approaches. The
present study followed an explanatory sequential mixed method design. The subjects of the study
were 7th, 8th and 9th grade students living in different area of Tehran city. Data was collected from a
written test and semi structured interviews. Our sample was 400 students. Interviews conducted with
15out of them. By analysing data and textbook based on Kuchemann’(1981) and Sfard’s(1991)
theories, students with such training were not recognizing the role of variable in different situation
and often see it as specific unknown. They also made mistakes for simplifying of algebraic expression
and they tried to get solution by joining of numbers and letters.
Akgün, L., & Özdemir, M. E. (2006). Students’ understanding of variables as general number and
unknown: A case study, The Teaching of Mathematics, 9(1).45-61.
2. Asquith, P., Stephens, A. C., Knuth, E. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Middle school mathematics
teachers' knowledge of students' understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and
variable, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 249-272.
3. Bednarz, N, Kieran,C& Lee, Lesley (1996). Approaches to Algebra: Perspectives for Research and
Teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers JETT, Vol. 11 (1); ISSN: 1989-9572 91
4. Collis, K. F. (1974(. Cognitive development and mathematics learning, paper prepared for
Psychology of Mathematics Education Workshop, Centre for Science Education, Chelsea College,
London, 28 June
5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods
Approaches (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Dede, Y. (2004). The concept of variable and identification its learning difficulties,
7. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 50-56.
8. Dogbey, G. Y. (2010). Concepts of variable in middle-grades mathematics textbooks during four
eras of mathematics education in the United States, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,
University of South Florida, Florida.
9. Ertekin, E., Yazici, E., & Delice, A. (2014). Investigation of primary mathematics student
teachers’ concept images: Cylinder and cone, International Journal of Mathematical Education
in Science and Technology,45(4),566-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.868537
10. Herscovics, N., & Kieran, C. (1980). Constructing meaning for the concept of equation,
Mathematics Teacher, 73, 572–580.
11. Jupri, A. & Drijvers, P. H. M. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in
algebra, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481-2502.
12. Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook
of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Reston, V A: NCTM.
13. Küchemann, D. (1981). ‘Algebra’, in K. Hart (ed.), Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11–
16, Murray, London, pp. 102–119.
14. Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., Weinberg, A., McNeil, N. M., & Stephens, A. C. (2005). Middle school
students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equality and variable, Zentralblatt für
Didaktik der Mathematik (International Reviews on Mathematical Education), 37, 68–76.
15. Leitzel, J. R. (1989). Critical considerations for the future of algebra instruction, In S. Wagner & C.
Kieran (Eds.): Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra (pp. 25-32). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Long, C. T., & DeTemple, D. W. (2003). Mathematical reasoning for elementary teachers, Reading,
Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
17. MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1997). Students understanding of algebraic notation: 11-15,
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33. pp.1–19.
18. McNeil N. M., Weinberg, A., Hattikudur, S., Stephens, A. C., Asquith, P., Knuth, E. J., & Alibali,
M. W. (2010). A is for apple: Mnemonic symbols hinder the interpretation of algebraic
expressions, Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), pp. 625 – 634.
19. Mulungye, M. M. (2010). Sources of students’ errors and misconceptions in algebra and influence
of classroom practice remediation in secondary schools Machakos Sub-County, Kenya,
Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Kenyatta University, Kenya.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School
Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
21. Norton, S. & Irvin, J. (2007).A concrete approach to teaching symbolic algebra, Retrieved March
24, 2010 from www.merga.net.au/documents/RP502007.pdf.
22. Philipp, R. A. (1992). The many uses of algebraic variables, Mathematics Teacher, 85, 7, 557–561.
23. Samo, M.A. (2009). Students’ perceptions about the symbols, letters, and signs in algebra and how
do these affect their learning of algebra: A case study in a government girl’s secondary school,
Karachi, International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning.
24. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on process and
objects as different sides of the same coin, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1-36.
Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers JETT, Vol. 11 (1); ISSN: 1989-9572 92
25. Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding, Mathematics
Teaching, 77, 1-7.
26. Stacey, K., & MacGregor, M. (2000). Learning the algebraic method of solving problems, Journal
of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 149-167.
27. Stacey, K. & Chick, H. (2004).Solving the problem with algebra. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M.
Kendal (Eds.), The Future of Teaching and Learning of Algebra, The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 1-20).
Boston: Kluwer.
28. Stephens, A. C. (2005). Developing students' understandings of variable mathematics, Teaching in
the Middle School, 11, 96–100
29. Swan, M. (2000). Making sense of algebra, Mathematics Teaching, 171, 16–19.
30. Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular
reference to limits and continuity, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.
31. Uçar Sarımanoğlu, N. (2019). The Investigation of Middle School Students’ Misconceptions about
Algebraic Equations, Studies in Educational Research and Development, 3(1), 93-114.
32. Ulusoy, F. (2013). An investigation of the concept of variable in Turkish elementary
mathematics teachers ‘guidebooks, Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the
World, 3(1), 139-149
33. Ursini,S.& Trigueros, M. (2001). A model for the uses of variable in elementary algebra,
Proceedings of the XXV International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,
vol. 4, pp. 361-369.
34. Wagner, S. (1983). What are these things called variables, Mathematics Teacher, 76, 474–479
35. Zahid (1995). A study of the causes of students’ conceptual problems in learning algebra,
Unpublished Masters theses Aga khan university institute for educational development AKUIED, Karachi.
- Article View: 214
- PDF Download: 122